Messages in this thread | | | From | "Al Boldi" <> | Subject | RE: Giving developers clue how many testers verifiedcertain kernel version | Date | Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:34:57 +0300 |
| |
Lee Revell wrote: { On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 21:15 -0500, Alejandro Bonilla wrote: > OK, I will, but I first of all need to learn how to tell if benchmarks > are better or worse.
Con's interactivity benchmark looks quite promising for finding scheduler related interactivity regressions. }
Scheduler performance does not imply net system performance.
In fact, a well tuned scheduler hides absolute performance-related issues!
--Al
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |