Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:53:35 -0700 | From | Paul Jackson <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.13-rc3-mm1 (ckrm) |
| |
Shailabh wrote: > So if the current CPU controller > implementation is considered too intrusive/unacceptable, it can be > reworked or (and we certainly hope not) even rejected in perpetuity.
It is certainly reasonable that you would hope such.
But this hypothetical possibility concerns me a little. Where would that leave CKRM, if it was in the mainline kernel, but there was no CPU controller in the mainline kernel? Wouldn't that be a rather serious problem for many users of CKRM if they wanted to work on mainline kernels?
-- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |