Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:28:54 +0200 | From | Voluspa <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference |
| |
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:02:36 +0200 Pavel Machek wrote: > Okay, if you have no C2/C3 like the dump above shows, unloading usb > will not help. It seems like your machine is simply not able to do > reasonable powersaving.
Because of the CPU, ACPI implementation or because of kernel acpi quality, x86_64 kernel quirks or...? It seems crazy that a modern CPU like this should be so backwards as to not implement sleep states. It being in a notebook and all. I blame intel kernel hackers ;-)
Mvh Mats Johannesson -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |