Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 Jul 2005 10:45:05 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: Why is 2.6.12.2 less stable on my laptop than 2.6.10? |
| |
Hi!
> Why can't I expect SWSusp work better and more reliable from release to > release?
Patches welcome. Or employ someone to do swsusp development for you.
> Some possible things that could help: > > *Addopt a no-regressions-allowed policy and everthing stops until any > identified regressions (in performance, functionally or stability) is fixed > or the changes are all rolled back. This works really well if in addition > organized pre-flight testing is done before calling a new version number. > You simply cannot rely on ad-hock regression testing and reporting. Its got > too much latency.
This would also mean "no development at all".
> * assign validation folks that the developer need to appease before changes > are allowed to be accepted into the tree.
So... get me someone to test swsusp in each -rc and -mm release... that would help. If you can't provide the manpower, why are you whining?
Pavel -- teflon -- maybe it is a trademark, but it should not be. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |