Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 12 Jul 2005 21:29:12 +0200 (CEST) | From | Tomasz Kłoczko <> | Subject | Re: Merging relayfs? |
| |
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Tom Zanussi wrote: [..] > > This is much more simpler and much better for control (also from point of > > view caching bugs in agregator code -> also from point of view kernel > > stability). > > > > Also .. probably some code for handle i.e. counters cen be the same as > > existing code in current kernel. > > Probably some "atomic" (and/or simpler) agregators can be usefull in other > > places in kernel for collecting some data during all time when system > > works .. so code for handle this can be reused in non-ocasinal > > tracing/measuring. > > And again: all without things like relayfs. > > Well, you should check out the sytemtap project. It's basically a > DTrace clone which is already doing these kinds of things with > kprobes, and it's using relayfs...
Probaly by this it will be harder to say "KProbes it is Solaris DTrace clone".
kloczek -- ----------------------------------------------------------- *Ludzie nie mają problemów, tylko sobie sami je stwarzają* ----------------------------------------------------------- Tomasz Kłoczko, sys adm @zie.pg.gda.pl|*e-mail: kloczek@rudy.mif.pg.gda.pl* | |