lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Kernel header policy
12.07.2005 20:38, Jim Nance wrote/a écrit:
>
>
> Perhaps a little history would help. In the beginning, the kernel was
> written with the intention that userland would be including the headers.
> And libc did include the kernel headers.
>
> This did provide an effective way to get new kernel features to show
> up in userland, but it created all sorts of other problems. Eventually
> it was decided/decreed that userland would NOT include kernel headers.
> Instead, libc would provide a set of headers which would either be
> compatable, or would marshel data into the form the kernel wanted.
>

So does this mean that all the "#ifdef __KERNEL__" are useless or are
they still used?

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-12 21:14    [W:0.098 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site