Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 9 Apr 2005 10:35:25 -0700 | From | Paul Jackson <> | Subject | Re: Kernel SCM saga.. |
| |
> (b) while I depend on the fact that if the SHA of an object matches, the > objects are the same, I generally try to avoid the reverse > dependency.
It might be a valid point that you want to leave the door open to using a different (than SHA1) digest. (So this means you going to store it as an ASCII string, right?)
But I don't see how that applies here. Any optimization that avoids rereading old versions if the digests match will never trigger on the day you change digests. No problem here - you doomed to reread the old version in any case.
Either you got your logic backwards, or I need another cup of coffee.
-- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@engr.sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |