Messages in this thread | | | From | Marcin Dalecki <> | Subject | Re: Kernel SCM saga.. | Date | Sat, 9 Apr 2005 03:21:49 +0200 |
| |
On 2005-04-09, at 03:09, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 03:00:44AM +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote: > >> Yes it sucks less for this purpose. See subversion as reference. > > Whatever solution people come up with, ideally it should be tolerant > to minor amounts of corruption (so I can recover the rest of my data > if need be) and it should also have decent sanity checks to find > corruption as soon as reasonable possible.
Yes this is the reason subversion is moving toward an alternative back-end based on a custom DB mapped closely to the file system.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |