Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: connector is missing in 2.6.12-rc2-mm1 | From | Evgeniy Polyakov <> | Date | Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:30:49 +0400 |
| |
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 01:17 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 11:42:57PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Guillaume Thouvenin <guillaume.thouvenin@bull.net> wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I don't see the connector directory in the 2.6.12-rc2-mm1 tree. So it > > > seems that you removed the connector? > > > > Greg dropped it for some reason. I think that's best because it needed a > > significant amount of rework. I'd like to see it resubitted in totality so > > we can take another look at it. > > Greg dropped it because he's radically changing the way he handles > patches. I still have them around here somewhere...
He probably was quite dissapointed/overflowed by it's quality and quantity, but please thank him for his comments and tell him it was very pleasant to work with.
> Yeah, here they are. Hm, I'd really like to stop carrying them around, > as my workload doesn't lend itself to handling these. > > If you don't mind, can you create up a new connector, super-io, and > kobject-connector patch and send them to andrew for him to add to -mm? > That way I'll not have to worry about them anymore, as they keep > floating in-and-out of the -mm releases depending on the state of my > trees. I can still handle your w1 patches, and have 2 of them pending. > > Is that ok with you?
Ok, I will prepare new series of that patches and will push them upstream.
Thank you.
> thanks, > > greg k-h -- Evgeniy Polyakov
Crash is better than data corruption -- Arthur Grabowski [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |