Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 06 Apr 2005 17:51:06 +1000 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains |
| |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > > >>* Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote: >> >> >>>2/5 >> >>>The previous patch fixed the last 2 places that directly access a >>>runqueue's sched-domain and assume it cannot be NULL. >>> >>>We can now use a NULL domain instead of a dummy domain to signify >>>no balancing is to happen. No functional changes. >>> >>>Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> >> >>Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> ^^^
Thanks.
> > > if the previous 'remove degenerate domains' patch would go away then > this patch needs to be merged/modified. (and most of the others as well) >
I probably should respin this so it goes in *first* anyway. Rather than doing half in the remove degenerate domains and half here.
-- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |