Messages in this thread | | | From | Blaisorblade <> | Subject | Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/7] uml: fix syscall table by including $(SUBARCH)'s one, for i386 | Date | Fri, 29 Apr 2005 22:31:18 +0200 |
| |
On Thursday 28 April 2005 20:10, Chris Wright wrote: > * blaisorblade@yahoo.it (blaisorblade@yahoo.it) wrote: > > Split the i386 entry.S files into entry.S and syscall_table.S which > > is included in the previous one (so actually there is no difference > > between them) and use the syscall_table.S in the UML build, instead of > > tracking by hand the syscall table changes (which is inherently > > error-prone). > > Xen can use this as well (it was on my todo list). Yes, I had this idea too. So I guess this will be promptly merged, right?
-- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso" Linux registered user n. 292729 http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |