Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 7/7] dlm: build | From | Valdis.Kletnieks@vt ... | Date | Mon, 25 Apr 2005 23:52:15 -0400 |
| |
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 14:25:25 PDT, Andrew Morton said: > David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > +config DLM
> Shouldn't it enable SCTP? Depend on NET?
Looks like it. As a related question, is the SCTP dependency something fairly innate to the design, or would layering it over other low-level transports in the future be a possibility? A first glance makes it look like only lowcomms.c and maybe midcomms.c would be affected.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |