lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH][RFC][0/4] InfiniBand userspace verbsimplementation
Date
Timur Tabi wrote,

>Any limit would have to be very high - definitely more than just half.
What if the
>application needs to pin 2GB? The customer is not going to buy 4+ GB of
RAM just
>because
>Linux doesn't like pinning more than half. In an x86-32 system, that would
required >PAE
>support and slow everything down.

>Off the top of my head, I'd say Linux would need to allow all but 512MB to
be pinned. >So
>you have 3GB of RAM, Linux should allow you to pin 2.5GB.

That is why we made it tunable, so that people could decide how to allow.

There is probably a better way to do it than some hard limit, but
that would take a little more understanding of the VM system than we had,
and that is why some of the core kernel folks maybe able to help us come up
with a better solution.

woody

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-26 01:36    [W:0.115 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site