Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Subject | Re: intercepting syscalls | From | Terje Malmedal <> | Date | Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:32:09 +0200 |
| |
[Arjan van de Ven] >> What do I do the next time I need to do something like this?
> use kprobes or so to actually replace the faulty lower level function.. > you don't know from how many different angles the lower level function > is called, so you're really best of by replacing it at the lowest > possible level, eg closest to the bug. That *very* seldomly is the > actual syscall function.
This is exactly what I want to do, but how do I do the replacing part?
I understand how I create pre_ and post_handlers with kprobes, but not how I can stop a function from being executed.
-- - Terje tm@basefarm.no - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |