lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Further copy_from_user() discussion.
From
Date
Vadim Lobanov <vlobanov@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> I think I misspoke a bit in my email above. The intent was not to
> eliminate all might_sleep() calls from the copy_from_user() code path;
> but rather juggle the source around a bit so there is only one
> might_sleep() call per each code path. Currently, in the default case,
> it calls it twice.
>
> By the way, is the following still true about might_sleep()?
> http://kerneltrap.org/node/3440/10103

With Ingo's realtime-preempt patch, might_sleep() expands to
might_resched(). The latter expands to cond_resched() only if
CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is enabled (for CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT this is not
needed since the kernel is involuntarily preemptible). In this case it
might be useful to have might_sleep() only called before memset().

--
Catalin

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-15 12:19    [W:0.050 / U:0.800 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site