Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 Apr 2005 09:32:55 +0200 | From | Andre Bender <> | Subject | Re: poor SATA performance under 2.6.11 (with < 2.6.11 is OK)? |
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > > OK so Tomasz Torch suggested that my drive was blacklisted somewhere > after 2.6.8.1 (it's the last kernel on which I have good performance). > > Does drive blacklisting = very poor performance? > And no drive blacklisting = good performance, and possibly data corruption? >
That's what has already been told some posts ago. The kernel developers don't blacklist anything that works just for fun. There seems to be a serious problem when combining this pieces of hardware so the combination is blacklisted to get it working properly but with (much) less performance.
cu
- --
- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS d-(--) s++:-a- c++(++) UL+++(+) P--- L++ ! EW++ !N !o K? w--- O@ M? V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP+++ t+ 5++ X++ R+ tv+ b++ DI- D+ Ge+++ hr(-) y+(+) - ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
They say that when you play a Microsoft CD backwards you can hear demonic voices... But that's nothing - When you play it forwards it installs Windows
- -------------------------------
My public key can be found at http://www.keyserver.net my fingerprint is 302C FD91 2CE0 487E E086 EEBC D8D9 2865 E32F 4D56 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCX24m29koZeMvTVYRAharAJ4r4aCCuDNt+B0zjv88tGgOEQIGMACgsVYm xibnwIYSV+8LUcnXaMImorE= =NHfy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |