Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Call to atention about using hash functions as content indexers (SCM saga) | From | Catalin Marinas <> | Date | Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:02:10 +0100 |
| |
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/12/05, Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz> wrote: > >> (iv) You fail to propose a better solution. > > I would feel safer with back end storage filenames based on email and > mtime together with an optional hash lookup that turns collisions into > worse performance. But that's just me.
Have a look at bazaar-ng (http://www.bazaar-ng.org/), they seem to do this. I had a quick look at it and they also seem to store the full files when they change (similar to git). It is also a bit ahead of git (started earlier) and looks quite promising.
-- Catalin
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |