Messages in this thread | | | From | "Bodo Eggert <>" <> | Subject | RE: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice. | Date | Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:41:20 +0200 |
| |
David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> wrote:
>>Copyright law only _explicitly_ grants a monopoly on preparation of >>derivative works. However, it is trivial, and overwhelmingly common, >>for a copyright owner to grant a license to create a derivative work >>that is conditional on how the licensee agrees to distribute (or not >>distribute) the derivative work. > > This would, of course, only make sense if you *had* to agree to the license > to *create* the derivative work. If you were able to create the derivative > work under first sale or fair use rights, then the restrictions in the > contract would not apply to you.
If you buy a W*nd*ws install CD, you can create a derived work, e.g. an image of your installation, under the fair use rights (IANAL). Can you distribute that image freely? -- Friendly fire isn't.
Friß, Spammer: dragon@soft-dindon.biz service@killadwaredrive.com fooling3@supplygood.com winkervm@misentry1982rx.us - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |