Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:02:16 +1000 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: [patch 1/9] GFP_ZERO fix |
| |
Andrew Morton wrote: > Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > >> #define GFP_LEVEL_MASK (__GFP_WAIT|__GFP_HIGH|__GFP_IO|__GFP_FS| \ >> - __GFP_COLD|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_REPEAT| \ >> - __GFP_NOFAIL|__GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_NO_GROW|__GFP_COMP) >> + __GFP_COLD|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_REPEAT|__GFP_NOFAIL| \ >> + __GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_NO_GROW|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_ZERO) > > > Passing GFP_ZERO into kmem_cache_alloc() is such a bizarre thing to do, > perhaps a BUG is the correct response. >
I just thought it was a bit cheeky given the comment right above it ;)
-- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |