Messages in this thread | | | From | Rob Landley <> | Subject | Policy question (was Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop) | Date | Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:09:28 -0400 |
| |
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 05:22 pm, Shawn Starr wrote: > --- Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > So nobody minds if I make this into a CONFIG > > > > option marked as Deprecated? :) > > > > Actually it should probably go through > > > > Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > > > > ...and give it *long* timeout, since it is API > > change. > > Pavel
Shouldn't all deprecated features be in feature-removal-schedule.txt?
There are four entries in feature-removal-schedule in 2.6.12-rc2, but `find . -name "Kconfig" | xargs grep -i deprecated` finds eight entries. (And there's more if the grep -i is for "obsolete" instead...)
Just wondering...
Rob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |