Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 02 Apr 2005 13:59:17 +1000 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: [Patch] sched: remove unnecessary sched domains |
| |
Siddha, Suresh B wrote: > On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 12:07:27PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > >>I was thinking we could fix that by running balance on fork/exec multiple >>times from top to bottom level domains. I'll have to measure the cost of >>doing that, because it may be worthwhile. > > > Agreed. > > BTW, why are we setting SD_BALANCE_FORK flag for NUMA domain on i386, ia64. > This should be set only on x86_64 and that too not for Intel systems. >
Mainly to see whether anyone reports regressions, and to exercise the code a bit.
-- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |