lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Patch] sched: remove unnecessary sched domains
Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 12:07:27PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>>I was thinking we could fix that by running balance on fork/exec multiple
>>times from top to bottom level domains. I'll have to measure the cost of
>>doing that, because it may be worthwhile.
>
>
> Agreed.
>
> BTW, why are we setting SD_BALANCE_FORK flag for NUMA domain on i386, ia64.
> This should be set only on x86_64 and that too not for Intel systems.
>

Mainly to see whether anyone reports regressions, and to exercise
the code a bit.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-06 13:31    [W:0.043 / U:0.416 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site