Messages in this thread | | | From | David Brownell <> | Subject | Re: klists and struct device semaphores | Date | Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:16:15 -0800 |
| |
On Monday 28 March 2005 9:44 am, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> How is this related to (8) above? Do you need some sort of protected, > short path through the core to add the device, but not bind it or add it > to the PM core?
Erm, why is there a distinction between "adding device" and "adding it to the PM core"? That's a conceptual problem right there. There should be no distinctio. (But it does make eminent sense to be able to add a device without necessarily binding it to a driver, since the "unbound driver" state is all over the place.)
- Dave
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |