Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 5 Feb 2005 20:38:13 +0100 | From | Adrian Bunk <> | Subject | Re: [2.6 patch] add compiler-gcc4.h |
| |
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 10:45:52AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > >As I already said in this thread: > > The currently used file for gcc 4 is compiler-gcc+.h, not > > compiler-gcc3.h . > > > >And the current setup is to have one file for every major number of gcc. > >I have no strong opinion whether this approach or the approach of one > >file for all gcc versions is better - but with the current approach, > >everything else than a separate file for gcc 4 wasn't logical. > > Yes it is. It's perfectly logical: gcc+ contains the "going forward" > version, and until it supports some feature that isn't in all versions > of gcc4, it's the right thing to do. >...
It doesn't seem to be logical for everyone whether compiler-gcc+.h or compiler-gcc3.h is used for gcc 4.0 ...
Perhaps compiler-gcc+.h (which wasn't always updated when compiler-gcc3.h was updated) should be removed?
> -hpa
cu Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |