Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 4 Feb 2005 01:41:39 +0100 (CET) | From | Tim Schmielau <> | Subject | Re: move-accounting-function-calls-out-of-critical-vm-code-paths.patch |
| |
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Well your patch certainly cleans things up in there and would be a good > thing to have as long as we can be sure that it doesn't break the > accounting in some subtle way.
I think it also fits well with the other accounting data which is only statistically probed at clock ticks.
> Which implies that we need to see some additional accounting code, so we > can verify that the base accumulation infrastructure is doing the expected > thing. As well as an ack from the interested parties. Does anyone know > what's happening with all the new accounting initiatives? I'm seeing no > activity at all.
Well, I'm here :), but I'm concentrating on making a GNU acct release happen. Anyways, as I'm not involved with memory accounting yet, I guess I should leave it to CSA and ELSA people to comment.
Tim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |