lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: uninterruptible sleep lockups
From
Date
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 22:05 -0300, Horst von Brand wrote:
> Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com> said:
[...]
> > Maybe I'm on crack, but would it not be technically possible to have all
> > resource usage be tracked so that when a task tries to do something and
> > hangs, eventually it gets cleaned up?
>
> Sure. But there is /no way/ to know if the task will ever do something
> (Turing's undecibility sees to that, even with perfect hardware), so the

ACK. But if root says "it will not come" (through whatever method), the
we have a decision good enough for real life.
The downside is that we need for each usage of these items explicit
checks and cleanup code (which wants to be written and tested) after
each usage.
Does this pay off?

Bernd
--
Firmix Software GmbH http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
Embedded Linux Development and Services

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:1.717 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site