Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:37:42 -0800 | From | Crispin Cowan <> | Subject | Re: Thoughts on the "No Linux Security Modules framework" old claims |
| |
Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro wrote:
>Also, it was a pretty good thing from them this piece of work. >Think that they investors may dislike the model they followed when the >merge happened, anyways, and as an example, I pretty ignore those >patents claims,for example, think that Type Enforcement (TE) is patented >and before SELinux got in mainline the enterprise with rights on the >patent made a public announcement about their "opening" and "for-free" >use of their patented model. > > You are confused. It is Secure Computing Corporation that holds patents that threaten SELinux http://www.securecomputing.com/pdf/Statement_of_Assurance.pdf
Immunix has never threatened any open source project with patent infringement.
Please get your facts straight before accusing someone of a serious act like that.
Crispin
-- Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. http://immunix.com/~crispin/ CTO, Immunix http://immunix.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |