lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 10/13] Solaris nfsacl workaround
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 05:43:24PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> ty den 15.02.2005 Klokka 21:35 (+0100) skreiv Olivier Galibert:
> > That's the second time I see you refusing an interoperability patch
> > without bothering to say what would be acceptable. Do we need a fork
> > between knfsd-pure and knfsd-actually-works-in-the-real-world or what?
>
> You appear to be under the misguided impression that if a patch is
> reviewed, and rejected, then somehow the responsibility for resolving
> your problem (and cleaning up the code) falls to the reviewer.
>
> I'm not aware of any such rule.

Resolving the problem and/or cleaning the code, no. Telling what kind
of patch would be acceptable is your responsability, yes. That's
where the difference is between a reviewer and a naysayer.

OG.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.146 / U:0.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site