Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:08:58 +0100 | From | Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <> | Subject | Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed |
| |
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:08:02 -0800, Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com> wrote: > is to clarify the non-compete stuff. We've had some people who have > indicated that they believed that if they used BK they were agreeing > that they would never work on another SCM system. We can see how it > is possible that people would interpret the license that way but that > wasn't our intent. What we would like to do is change the language to
I always interpreted it the other way, that if I start working on other SCM I should stop using BK.
> say that if you use BK you are agreeing that you won't work on another > SCM for 1 year after you stop using BK. But after that you would be
I don't even plan working on some SCM system, but being tainted for 1 year for just *using* BK is not worth the price IMHO.
Regards, Bartlomiej - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |