lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [BK] upgrade will be needed
    On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:08:02 -0800, Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com> wrote:
    > is to clarify the non-compete stuff. We've had some people who have
    > indicated that they believed that if they used BK they were agreeing
    > that they would never work on another SCM system. We can see how it
    > is possible that people would interpret the license that way but that
    > wasn't our intent. What we would like to do is change the language to

    I always interpreted it the other way, that if I start working on other
    SCM I should stop using BK.

    > say that if you use BK you are agreeing that you won't work on another
    > SCM for 1 year after you stop using BK. But after that you would be

    I don't even plan working on some SCM system, but being
    tainted for 1 year for just *using* BK is not worth the price IMHO.

    Regards,
    Bartlomiej
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:4.147 / U:0.036 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site