Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:29:18 -0800 | From | Chris Wright <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM |
| |
* Matt Mackall (mpm@selenic.com) wrote: > Feh. The RT scheduling class issue is orthogonal. Addressing mlock and > scheduling class at once (and nothing else) is actually an ugliness of > your LSM approach as there are folks who want mlock and not RT.
Last I checked they could be controlled separately in that module. It has been suggested (by me and others) that one possible solution would be to expand it to be generic for all caps.
thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |