lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] add feature-removal-schedule.txt documentation
Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 03:26:21PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>>Which begs the question "how do we ever get rid of these things when we
>>have no projected date for Linux-2.8"?
>>
>>I'd propose:
>>
>>a) Create Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt which describes
>> things which are going away, when, why, who is involved, etc.
>
> Ok, I'll bite, here's a patch that does just that. Look good?

Brodo, can you add a little more info to this, please?

---
Add 2.4.x cpufreq /proc and sysctl interface removal
to the feature-removal-schedule.

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rddunlap@osdl.org>

diffstat:=
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 9 +++++++++
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+)

---

diff -Naurp ./Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt~cpufreq ./Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
--- ./Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt~cpufreq 2005-01-07 08:48:26.568969672 -0800
+++ ./Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt 2005-01-07 08:55:50.658457808 -0800
@@ -15,3 +15,12 @@ Why: It has been unmaintained for a numb
against the LSB, and can be replaced by using udev.
Who: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>

+---------------------------
+
+What: /proc/sys/cpu and the sysctl interface to cpufreq (2.4.x interfaces)
+When: January 2005
+Files: drivers/cpufreq/: cpufreq_userspace.c, proc_intf.c
+ function calls throughout the kernel tree
+Why: Deprecated, has been replaced/superseded by (what?)....
+Who: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
+
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.346 / U:0.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site