lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?
    On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 06:01:46PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
    > > OTOH, if conntrack isn't loaded forwarded packet are never defragmented,
    > > so frag_list should be empty. So probably false alarm, sorry.
    >
    > I've just checked Phil's mails - both Phil and myself are using
    > netfilter on the troublesome boxen.
    >
    > Also, since FragCreates is zero, and this does mean that the frag_list
    > is not empty in all cases so far where ip_fragment() has been called.
    > (Reading the code, if frag_list was empty, we'd have to create some
    > fragments, which increments the FragCreates statistic.)

    The below testcase seems to illustrate the problem nicely -- ip_dst_cache
    grows but never shrinks:

    On gateway:

    iptables -I FORWARD -d 10.10.10.0/24 -j DROP

    On client:

    for i in `seq 1 254` ; do ping -s 1500 -c 5 -w 1 -f 10.10.10.$i ; done


    Phil
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:4.927 / U:0.144 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site