Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 1 Jan 2005 18:59:34 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: PATCH: 2.6.10 - Misrouted IRQ recovery for review |
| |
Hi!
> Ported to the new kernel/irq code.
Perhaps some Documentation/ patch would be nice?
I always thought manually polling interrupt handlers might be usefull, and it indeed was very usefull on philips velo 1... Pavel
> +static int __init irqfixup_setup(char *str) > +{ > + irqfixup = 1; > + printk(KERN_WARNING "Misrouted IRQ fixup support enabled.\n"); > + printk(KERN_WARNING "This may impact system performance.\n"); > + return 1; > +} > + > +__setup("irqfixup", irqfixup_setup); > + > +static int __init irqpoll_setup(char *str) > +{ > + irqfixup = 2; > + printk(KERN_WARNING "Misrouted IRQ fixup and polling support enabled.\n"); > + printk(KERN_WARNING "This may significantly impact system performance.\n"); > + return 1; > +} > + > +__setup("irqpoll", irqpoll_setup); >
-- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |