lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: bug in md write barrier support?
From
Date
On Mer, 2004-09-08 at 16:46, Jens Axboe wrote:
> That's a worry if it really does that - does it, or are you just
> speculating about possible problems?

I2O defines cache flush very losely. It flushes the cache and returns
when the cache has been flushed. From playing with the controllers I
have it seems some at least merge further queued writes into the output
stream. Thus if I issue

write 1, 2, 3, 4 , 40, 41, flush cache, write 5, 6, 100

it'll write 1,2,3,4,5,6, 40, 41, report flush cache complete.

Obviously I can implement full barrier semantics in the driver if need
be but that would cost performance hence the question.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.114 / U:0.524 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site