lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA"
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 06:10:51PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 07:01:22PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > The following architetures have their own "config PCMCIA" instead of
> > including drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig (in 2.6.8-rc3-mm1):
> > - m68k
> > - s390
> > - sparc
> > - sparc64
> >
> > Is there any good reason for this, or would a patch to change these
> > architectures to include drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig be OK?
>
> What about switching them to use drivers/Kconfig instead?

drivers/Kconfig doesn't source drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig (and m68k
already uses drivers/Kconfig).


But after a second look, I begin to understand a bit more:
Most of the architectures in question even have help text for the PCMCIA
option, but the option itself isn't asked.

IOW: It's impossible to enable them.

Is there eny reason for such options that are never visible nor enabled,
or could they be removed?


cu
Adrian

--

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:3.311 / U:1.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site