lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: Solving suspend-level confusion
    Date
    On Friday 06 August 2004 13:04, Pavel Machek wrote:

    > > These look to me like "wrong device-level suspend state" cases.
    >
    > Actually, suspend-to-disk has to suspend all devices *twices*. Once it
    > wants them in "D0 but DMA/interrupts stopped", and once in "D3cold but
    > I do not really care power is going to be cut anyway". I do not think
    > this can be expressed with PCI states.

    How are those different from "PCI_D1" then later "PCI_D3hot"?
    I'd understood that loss of VAUX was always possible, so robust
    drivers always had to handle resume from PCI_D3cold.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:4.018 / U:0.140 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site