Messages in this thread | | | From | David Brownell <> | Subject | Re: Solving suspend-level confusion | Date | Sat, 7 Aug 2004 15:14:49 -0700 |
| |
On Friday 06 August 2004 13:04, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > These look to me like "wrong device-level suspend state" cases. > > Actually, suspend-to-disk has to suspend all devices *twices*. Once it > wants them in "D0 but DMA/interrupts stopped", and once in "D3cold but > I do not really care power is going to be cut anyway". I do not think > this can be expressed with PCI states.
How are those different from "PCI_D1" then later "PCI_D3hot"? I'd understood that loss of VAUX was always possible, so robust drivers always had to handle resume from PCI_D3cold. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |