Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 07 Aug 2004 16:20:48 -0700 | From | Hans Reiser <> | Subject | Re: secure computing for 2.6.7 |
| |
Stephen Smalley wrote:
>On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 15:27, Hans Reiser wrote: > > >>Am I right to think that this could complement nicely our plans >>described at www.namesys.com/blackbox_security.html >> >> > >Hi Hans, > >Out of curiosity, what do you think that this proposal will achieve that >cannot already be done via SELinux policy? SELinux policy can already >express access rules based not only on the executable and user, but even >the entire call chain that led to a given executable. > > > Where do you store the access rules? With the executable? How do you automate their determination? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |