lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Use NULL instead of integer 0 in security/selinux/
From
Date
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> writes:
>> What's wrong with using 0 as the NULL pointer? In contexts where
>> a plain 0 is unsafe, NULL is usually unsafe as well.
>
> It's a general sparse cleanup people are doing across the entire tree.
> It's the "proper" way to do pointer comparisons post-K&R.

But 0 in such a context isn't an integer, it's a pointer...

If sparse really warns about such things, the warning seems wrong.

-Miles
--
((lambda (x) (list x x)) (lambda (x) (list x x)))
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.198 / U:0.800 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site