lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.7-mm6
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 15:34:17 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:

> William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> wrote:
> >
> > Third, some naive check for undefined symbols failed to understand the
> > relocation types indicating that a given operand refers to some hard
> > register, which manifest as undefined symbols in ELF executables. A
> > patch to refine its criteria, which I used to build with, follows. rmk
> > and hpa have some other ideas on this undefined symbol issue I've not
> > quite had the opportunity to get a clear statement of yet.
>
> I converted that to a non-fatal warning due to the same problem on sparc64.

Andrew, Russell posted to us in private email an objdump based
check that didn't trigger for the register declaration case.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.117 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site