Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:05:56 +1000 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] consolidate sched domains |
| |
Dimitri Sivanich wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 02:50:46PM -0700, Siddha, Suresh B wrote: > >>On Friday 23 July 2004 08:30, Dimitri Sivanich wrote: >> >>>Do other architectures need to define their own cpu_sibling_maps, or am I >>>missing something that would define that for IA64 and others? >>> >>Nick means, all the architectures which use CONFIG_SCHED_SMT needs to define >>cpu_sibling_map. >> >>Nick, aren't you missing the attached fix in your patch? >> >>thanks, >>suresh >> > >Ok, but cpu_to_phys_group() does a lookup in cpu_sibling map: >__init static int cpu_to_phys_group(int cpu) >{ > return first_cpu(cpu_sibling_map[cpu]); >} > >and is called from outside of a CONFIG_SCHED_SMT ifdef here: >
Yes of course, thank you.
The fix is for cpu_to_phys_group() to just return cpu when !CONFIG_SCHED_SMT.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |