lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Delete cryptoloop
Andrew suggested:
> printk("cryptoloop will be ... June 30, 2005 ...

Andreas asked:
> If EXPERIMENTAL isn't discuraging enough why not use BROKEN?

Won't printk's will reach a wider proportion of the intended audience
than CONFIG variations?

And the specificity of the date-certain in the printk enables individual
planning and adaptive behaviour that the timelessness of CONFIG labels
can't touch.

Does your printk idea work for devfs as well, Andrew?

--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.113 / U:0.900 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site