Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 13 Jul 2004 06:19:44 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: preempt-timing-2.6.8-rc1 |
| |
William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> The semantics I implemented are warning for strictly above the >> preempt_thresh. Whether those semantics are ideal is irrelevant; it's >> faithful to those semantics.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 11:10:09PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > You are right - I misread it, sorry.
William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> Given that people are asking for sub- >> millisecond latencies, maybe I should increase the precision.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 11:10:09PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > Would soon be useful I think.
Let me spin up the CONFIG_PREEMPT=n fix and then I'll move on that.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |