Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:53:26 -0400 | From | Timothy Miller <> | Subject | Re: [announce] [patch] Voluntary Kernel Preemption Patch |
| |
I have a question about voluntary kernel preemption in general. (Shouldn't we call this "cooperative multitasking"?)
There are two disadvantages to voluntary preemption. One is that the kernel thread my not sleep enough (high latency), and the other is that the kernel thread may sleep too much (wasted CPU for context switch overhead). The advantage of using the timer interrupt instead is that the preemption happens only as often as it needs to.
My question is this: Do your reschedule points (might_sleep or whatever you end up using) ALWAYS reschedule, or do they only reschedule after a certain period of time (timer interrupt increments counter, and reschedule point does nothing if it's too early)?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |