Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: desktop and multimedia as an afterthought? | Date | Mon, 12 Jul 2004 19:54:23 -0400 | From | Paul Davis <> |
| |
>It's too bad that the multimedia community didn't participate >much during the 2.5.xx development leading up to 2.6.0. If they >had done so, the situation might be different today. Fortunately, >fixing up the multimedia problems isn't too risky to do during >the stable 2.6.xx series.
I regret that this description is persisting here. "We" (the audio developer community) did not participate because it was made clear that our needs were not going to be considered. We were told that the preemption patch was sufficient to provide "low latency", and that rescheduling points dotted all over the place was bad engineering (probably true). With this as the pre-rendered verdict, there's not a lot of point in dedicating time to tracking a situation that clearly is not going to work.
The kernel is not going to provide adequate latency for multimedia needs without either (1) latency issues being front and center in every kernel developer's mind, which seems unlikely and/or (2) conditional rescheduling points added to the kernel, which appears to require non-mainstreamed patches.
--p
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |