Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:06:50 -0700 (PDT) | From | Phy Prabab <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Staircase Scheduler v6.3 for 2.6.7-rc2 |
| |
Just to clarify, setting compute 1 implys interactive 0?
These numbers are very reproducable nad have done them (in a continuous loop) for two hours.
The test is a make of headers for a propritary exec. Making headers is rather simple is all it does it link a bunch of h files (traversing dirs) and some dependance generation (3 files, yacc and lex). I have moved the source code base to local disk to dicount nfs issues (though the difference is neglibible and nfs performance on 2.6 is generally faster than 2.4).
I have tried to get a good test case that can be submitted. Still trying.
Any suggestions to try to diagnose this?
Thanks! Phy > > > Hi. > > How repeatable are the numbers normally? Some idea > of what it is you're > benchmarking may also help in understanding the > problem; locking may be an > issue with what you're benchmarking and out-of-order > scheduling is not as > forgiving of poor locking. Extending the RR_INTERVAL > and turning off > interactivity makes it more in-order and more > forgiving of poor locking or > yield(). > > Compute==1 setting inactivates interactivity anyway, > but that's not really > relevant to your figures since you had set > interactive 0 when you set compute > 1. > > Con >
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |