Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Mon, 7 Jun 2004 23:23:03 +0200 | From | Dominik Brodowski <> | Subject | [PATCH 3/3] fix for small xloops [Was: Re: Too much error in __const_udelay() ?] |
| |
The const_udelay calculation relies on the "overflow" of the lower 32 bits of the mull operation. What's in the lower 32 bits is "cut off", so that a "rounding down" phenomenon exists. For large arguments to {n,u}delay, this does not matter, as udelay and ndelay round _up_ themselves. However, for small delays (for cyclone timer: up to 20ns; for pmtmr-based delay timer it's even up to 1500ns or 1us) it _is_ a critical error. Empirical testing has shown that it happens only (for usual values of loops_per_jiffies) if xloops is lower or equal to six. Let's be safe, and double that value, and add one xloop if xloop is smaller than 13.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
diff -ruN linux-original/arch/i386/lib/delay.c linux/arch/i386/lib/delay.c --- linux-original/arch/i386/lib/delay.c 2004-06-07 23:02:02.472656160 +0200 +++ linux/arch/i386/lib/delay.c 2004-06-07 22:55:40.063791144 +0200 @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ __asm__("mull %0" :"=d" (xloops), "=&a" (d0) :"1" (xloops),"0" (current_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy * HZ)); + if (unlikely(xloops < 13)) + xloops++; __delay(xloops); } - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |