Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:55:01 +1000 | From | Anton Blanchard <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpumask 5/10 rewrite cpumask.h - single bitmap based implementation |
| |
> aargh! It's back!
Its stalking you.
> There's something about this patch which make me break out in hives. Does > it *really* need to be that complicated?
If we dont want maximum backwards compatibility we can get rid of the < sizeof(long) bits.
> iirc, the last time I looked through this I was unable to convince myself > that it was endianness-correct. Is it?
Should be, but we could boot it on something 64bit little endian to prove it.
Anton - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |