Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 9 May 2004 19:41:22 -0500 | From | Matt Mackall <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Un-inline spinlocks on ppc64 |
| |
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 08:31:44PM -0400, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > yOn Sun, 9 May 2004, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > The patch below moves the ppc64 spinlocks and rwlocks out of line and > > > into arch/ppc64/lib/locks.c, and implements _raw_spin_lock_flags for > > > ppc64. > > > > > > > It included a hunk against include/asm-ppc64/offsets.h, which I dropped. > > Regarding CONFIG_INLINE_SPINLOCKS, could we call it CONFIG_SPINLINE as is > the current option supported on i386?
Ugh, I've never liked that config name. Let's change it to be the less clever version, please.
-- Matt Mackall : http://www.selenic.com : Linux development and consulting - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |