Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Distributions vs kernel development | From | Felipe Alfaro Solana <> | Date | Fri, 07 May 2004 19:09:35 +0200 |
| |
On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 17:53, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > After having being burned twice: first by Mandrake and supermount, and second > by SuSe and reiserfs attributes; are any of the distributions committed to > making sure that their distribution will run the standard kernel? (ie. 2.6.X from > kernel.org). When running a non-vendor kernel, I need to reasonably expect that the system > will boot and all the filesystems and standard devices are available. I don't > expect every startup script to run clean, or every device that has a driver > only in the vendor kernel to work.
Fedora Core 2 Test 3 runs beatifully with a stock kernel (I'm running FC2T3 with a stock 2.6.6-rc3-mm2 kernel). I suggest you to take a look at it.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |