Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 4 May 2004 10:46:42 +0100 | From | viro@parcelfa ... | Subject | Re: d_splice_alias() problem. |
| |
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 05:00:15PM +1000, Greg Banks wrote:
> Ok, how about this...it's portable, and not racy, but may perturb the > logic slightly by also taking dentries off the unused list in the case > where they already had d_count>=1. I'm not sure how significant that is. > In any case this also passes my tests.
a) ask RCU folks to review - the current logics in dcache.c is extremely brittle as it is.
b) after rereading that code, I _really_ don't like the crap with "hashed but disconnected" nfsd is pulling off. Neil, care to give detailed reasons why you are doing that? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |