Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 25 May 2004 20:47:51 -0700 | From | Dan Kegel <> | Subject | Re: bringing back 'make symlinks'? |
| |
Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 08:45:18AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > >>In the 2.4 kernel, 'make symlinks' created the symlinks needed >>to use the kernel tree's headers for building a gcc/glibc toolchain. >> >>In the 2.6 kernel, you can do the same thing with 'include include/asm'. >>Unless you're trying to build arm or cris, or maybe others, in which case >>you also need 'include/asm-$(ARCH)/.arch'. > ... > > In current 2.6 there exitst a target named: modules_prepare > It does a bit more than what symlinks did in 2.4 - actually prepare for > building external modules.
Right, and that's a problem, because the 'bit more' it does requires a target compiler -- which isn't available while bootstrapping the target compiler!
The way things are now, I can build toolchains for everything except the sh architecture (though my toolchain bootstrap script is ugly as noted due to the lack of 'make symlinks'). I'm not sure if the sh architecture makefile even has targets to make all the needed symlinks in the absense of a working target compiler; I'll look at that and maybe submit a minimal patch when I get a chance. - Dan
-- My technical stuff: http://kegel.com My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |